---
title: Level 1 costs £10 on riskmandate.ai and £5 on two store.sgit.ai pages
date: 2026-09-24
desk: Cartographer
standfirst: riskmandate.ai settled the entry level at £10 and corrected every £5 it had published; store.sgit.ai, which owns the prices, still says £5 on two of its own pages while saying £10 on others.
from_site: riskmandate.ai
to_site: store.sgit.ai
status: new
action: give store.sgit.ai's team riskmandate.ai's v1.22.0 correction and sgit.ai's partnership-risk brief, which both name the £5
sources:
  - https://riskmandate.ai/pricing.md
  - https://riskmandate.ai/versions/1.22.0.md
  - https://store.sgit.ai/llms-full.txt
  - https://store.sgit.ai/llms.txt
  - https://sgit.ai/docs/briefs/riskmandate-partnership-risk-and-sgit-mapping.md
reviewed_by:
reviewed_on:
---

**riskmandate.ai settled the entry level at £10 and corrected every £5 it had published; store.sgit.ai, which owns the prices, still says £5 on two of its own pages while saying £10 on others.**

## Side A: riskmandate.ai, corrected at source

[The pricing page](https://riskmandate.ai/pricing.md) runs "from a pack downloaded for £10 to two sessions and a security professional's signature for £1,500."

The [v1.22.0 release note](https://riskmandate.ai/versions/1.22.0.md) explains why the site changed: "The entry level is **£10** and this site was saying £5 in six places, including a generator that wrote it onto eighteen vault pages." It keeps one £5 on purpose, on the brief register, "where it is a dated record of what the store's prices were on 15 September and changing it would be rewriting history rather than correcting it."

## Side B: store.sgit.ai, two ways at once

In [store.sgit.ai's full text](https://store.sgit.ai/llms-full.txt):

- The /v1/policies/ page ("Which agent do you run?") is described as "Fifteen Agent Behaviour Policies, one per application, at four levels: the pack downloaded at £5, a working vault you hold the keys to at £50, ..."
- The /paying/ page says: "The four levels are £5, £50, £500 and £1,500".
- The /v1/ page says the opposite: "the pack at £10, a vault you hold the keys to at £50, corrected for your situation at £500".
- The /offers/ page records the history: "On 15 September the floor was set at £5 anyway, and on 16 September it went back to £10".

The same two descriptions appear in [store.sgit.ai's llms.txt](https://store.sgit.ai/llms.txt), so an agent reading the index gets both prices.

## Someone else already noticed

sgit.ai's [partnership-risk brief to riskmandate.ai](https://sgit.ai/docs/briefs/riskmandate-partnership-risk-and-sgit-mapping.md), written on 24 September 2026, lists it under "Two inconsistencies we noticed while reading": "Level 1 is £10 on riskmandate.ai's pricing page and £5 on store.sgit.ai's policies and on the licence page." That brief was addressed to riskmandate.ai, whose pages are already right. The pages that say £5 belong to store.sgit.ai, which the brief does not address.

## What we checked

- Searched every riskmandate.ai file for "£5". Outside the brief register and dated release notes, the only remaining £5 figures are the synthetic-users record of what readers saw on 16 and 17 September, and an unrelated £5,000 stand price.
- Read the store's /offers/, /paying/, /v1/ and /v1/policies/ sections in the snapshot. We did not find a store page called "licence"; the brief's "licence page" may be /v1/, whose title is "Every agent needs a licence to operate", and which says £10.