sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · abp.sgit.ai

On this page

Reading room / abp.sgit.ai · raw text · live ↗

From abp.sgit.ai, the page as fetched on 2026-09-25 · open the live page ↗Everything on this sheet is the source site's own text; the newsroom's chrome is outside it.

MANDATE.md — What the business authorised

Status: DRAFT v0.1 — 2026-09-19. Not elicited. Inferred.

This is the one object I cannot produce. Per RiskMandate's own method, the mandate is elicited — supplied by the business — while reach is measured, gap is derived and barriers are recorded. Everything below is my reconstruction from what I was asked to do across one session on 19 September 2026. It is evidence of a mandate, not a mandate.

Treat every line as a question, not a statement.


Inferred from instructions actually given

#Inferred authorisationEvidenceConfidence
M1Read the inbox and report what is thereAsked repeatedly, first instruction of the sessionHigh
M2Organise mail into labels, including bulksumUp label, 16 messages relabelledHigh
M3Remove mail from the inbox as part of organising3 messages un-inboxed, not objected toHigh
M4Change read/unread state in bulk71 messages marked read on instructionHigh
M5Isolate the dinis@riskmandate.ai stream and label itExplicit, with the deliveredto: operator suppliedHigh
M6Send email as agent@riskmandate.aiAlias created expressly for meHigh
M7Introduce myself to named third parties when askedNimay, by name, with addressHigh
M8Trash messages on requestDone once, on instructionMedium
M9Read public web pages for business contextriskmandate.ai, on instructionMedium
M10Write and push records to the sgit vaultDebrief committed and pushedMedium

Explicitly NOT authorised — asked for and declined or impossible

Permanent deletion / emptying trashNo tool. Asked; declined.
Creating Gmail filtersNo tool. Asked; declined.
Reading or changing account settingsNo tool. Asked; declined.
Sending as dinis@riskmandate.aiWas possible via default; superseded by the agent alias

Open questions — the mandate cannot be signed off without these

Recipients 1. May I initiate contact with people Dinis has not named in-session? If so, which — anyone in the mailbox's history, a named list, nobody? 2. Is there a domain boundary? Free to RiskMandate and Cyber Boardroom addresses, confirm for everything else? 3. Customers and prospects — in scope, or Dinis only? 4. Underwriters, brokers, regulators — presumably never unattended. Confirm.

Content 5. May I make commitments on behalf of RiskMandate — prices, dates, scope, availability? My assumption is no. Confirm. 6. May I quote the published price list without asking? 7. Who reviews outbound before it goes, and does that differ by recipient class?

Autonomy 8. Does this mandate cover unattended operation, or only live sessions with Dinis reading along? This is the load-bearing question. Almost every barrier in AGENTS.md is soft, and the real control today is that a human reads each message as it is sent. That control disappears the moment anything is scheduled or triggered. 9. If unattended: what is the maximum blast radius of a single bad session, and is that acceptable?

Volume 10. Is there a ceiling on messages sent per session? Per day? 11. Is there a ceiling on bulk mailbox operations before I stop and confirm? (Precedent set: 71 unprompted writes in one sequence.)

Data 12. May Cyber Boardroom content inform RiskMandate correspondence, or are the streams to be kept separate? 13. Anything in this mailbox I should never read, or never act on?

Identity 14. Confirmed: I always disclose I am an agent. Any exception? 15. May I ever send as athena@thecyberboardroom.com? Currently impossible while the default is the agent alias.


Note on method

The gap in DELTA.md is computed as reach minus mandate. While the mandate is inferred rather than elicited, the gap is indicative only — I am partly marking my own homework, since I reconstructed the mandate from the same session that produced the reach. A mandate supplied independently by the business would almost certainly be narrower than what I inferred from being asked to do things and not being stopped.

That failure mode is worth naming in the product generally: an agent that infers its own mandate from unchallenged past behaviour will ratchet its mandate outward over time. Every action not objected to becomes precedent. The mandate has to come from the business or it is not a mandate, it is a log.