sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · graphs.sgit.ai · llms-full

On this page

Reading room / graphs.sgit.ai / llms-full.txt · section 12 of 15

09 — Licensing Decision

Decided by Dinis Cruz, 21 August 2026. This file records the decision and the mechanics of applying it. It supersedes the "resolve before launch" framing of gap G8 in 08__gaps-and-fresh-writing.md.


The decision

Unless a document explicitly says otherwise, every .md file in the corpus was authored by Dinis Cruz and is released under CC BY 4.0. The same applies to the entire content of every *.sgit.ai website.

Irrevocability is the point, not a risk to be managed: the licence is what guarantees the material stays readable — by its author, by future collaborators, and by agents — regardless of what happens to any company, platform or vault that currently hosts it. A grant that could be withdrawn would not provide that guarantee.

G8 is therefore closed as a blocker. What remains is mechanical: stamping the files that lack the line, fixing one attribution, and resolving one repo-level inconsistency.


Canonical licence line

Use this exact wording — it is already the dominant form in the corpus (884 occurrences), placed as the last line of the document after a --- rule:


---

This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).

The longer variant (105 occurrences) is also acceptable and preferable for public-facing pages:

This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share and adapt this material for any purpose, including commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit.

For JSON artefacts, use a top-level field — the pattern already set by v0.33.35__data__sg-send-2fa-mappings.json:

"license": "CC BY 4.0"

Current state, measured at v0.33.62

ScopeCountState
.md files carrying the CC BY line1,103✅ already released
Founder briefs carrying it1,027 of 1,302✅
Founder briefs missing it275⬜ to stamp
Tier-0 graph documents carrying it15 of 17 .md✅
library/concepts/*.md0 of 4⬜ see attribution note
v0.33.35__data__sg-send-2fa-mappings.jsoninline "license": "CC BY 4.0"✅
.issues/config/*.jsonno licence field⬜ to stamp

Where the 275 unstamped briefs sit — heavily front-loaded, so the graph corpus (June–August) is almost fully covered already:

MonthMissing
March116
February79
May27
April25
June24
August3
July1

The corpus-wide picture is larger than the briefs

Running licence-audit.py across team/ and library/ (excluding vendored dependencies and library/alchemist/) gives the real number:

CC BY 4.0 coverage: 1,101 / 3,248  (33.9%)
Unstamped: 2,147
AreaUnstamped
team/roles1,075
team/humans (beyond the briefs)569
library/sgraph-send275
team/comms123
library/guides34
team/villager26
team/town-planner21
library/docs11
library/skills7
library/concepts4
library/roadmap2

The founder briefs were the well-tended part. The role reviews — the Architect, AppSec, Dev, Librarian and QA output that makes up the bulk of the corpus — are almost entirely unstamped, and several of them are Tier-0/Tier-1 candidates for both pki.sgit.ai and graphs.sgit.ai. One --fix run closes all of it.


Three mechanical items

1 · library/concepts/ — stamp, and fix the attribution

The four files carry no licence line, and library/concepts/README.md states they are "canonical philosophy and architecture documents from the Issues-FS project… references — not SGraph Send artifacts."

Under the decision above, same author, so CC BY 4.0 applies. But the attribution should name the origin correctly rather than silently reassigning it to SG/Send — that is the same provenance discipline these sites argue for. Suggested footer for each of the four:

---

Originally written for the Issues-FS project (v0.4.0, 5 February 2026); imported into SGraph Send on 11 June 2026.

This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).

Files: v0_4_0__thinking-in-graphs.md · v0_4_0__compatibility-through-connectivity.md · v0_4_0__lexicon-architecture.md · README.md

Consequence for the site: /start/ is unblocked. It is built almost entirely from thinking-in-graphs.md, and that page is now publishable.

2 · Repo-level LICENSE says Apache 2.0

SGraph-AI__App__Send/LICENSE is the Apache License 2.0. Someone reading only that file would reasonably conclude the whole repository — documents included — is Apache 2.0, which contradicts 1,103 per-file CC BY grants over the same text.

Standard resolution — code and content licensed separately. Add to the README, and to a LICENSES.md:

Code in this repository is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE). Documentation and written content — the .md files under team/, library/ and docs/, and the content of the *.sgit.ai websites — are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), unless a specific document states otherwise.

3 · *.sgit.ai websites

Each site already carries "CC BY 4.0 · the sgit project" in its footer. Under this decision that becomes a stated site-wide policy rather than a per-page footer. Add to each site's /about/participant.html or /admin/index.html, and to llms.txt:

All content on this site is released under CC BY 4.0. The raw markdown under /briefs/ is the source of truth and carries the same licence.

For graphs.sgit.ai specifically, put it in llms.txt as well as the footer — an agent that only ever reads llms.txt (see 06__house-style-and-conventions.md §3) should learn the licence from that one fetch.


What the licence does not change

CC BY 4.0 governs reuse. It says nothing about whether something should be published. These remain excluded regardless of licence, for reasons unrelated to copyright:

ExcludedReason
LinkedIn network CRM (briefs/06/10/network-intelligence/v0.33.16__dev-brief__...linkedin-semantic-knowledge-graph-crm-outreach-workflow.md)Real personal data about third parties. Data protection, not licensing
Odysseus case study (briefs/06/20/odysseus-mandate-analysis/v0.33.30__research-brief__...)Names a real third-party product and analyses its security posture — legal read
library/alchemist/Commercial material; the one-pager cites "30 paying customers" and "592 tests" which may be stale
AppSec PKI reviews (team/roles/appsec/reviews/02/21/v0.5.0__review__pki-architecture-security{,-revised}.md)An attack roadmap against code that is still live
<PARTNER-NAME-REDACTED> (20 files) · AWS account <AWS-ACCOUNT-REDACTED> (17 files) · <PACK-NAME-REDACTED> / <PACK-NAME-REDACTED> (2 files)Redact before any bulk publication

Third-party material quoted inside CC BY documents stays under its own terms. Vendor system cards, arXiv papers, the Brave Comet research, EU AI Act text and external URLs are quoted, not relicensed. Worth one line on the site's licence page.


The audit script

licence-audit.py (shipped in this pack) reports and optionally fixes licence coverage. Run it from the repo root.

# report only
python3 licence-audit.py

# report, restricted to the graph corpus
python3 licence-audit.py --path team/humans/dinis_cruz/briefs/06

# apply the canonical line to every unstamped .md (writes files)
python3 licence-audit.py --fix

# CI mode: exit 1 if anything under the given paths is unstamped
python3 licence-audit.py --check team/ library/

Suggested CI gate: run --check on team/ and library/ so no new document lands without a licence line. That makes the default stamped, which is the whole point of the decision.

Behaviour worth knowing before you run --fix:


This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).


== briefs/00__pack-readme.md