02 — The Influence Map: every entry, with its evidence
Version v0.33.62 · 25 August 2026
Method The corpus (SGraph-AI__App__Send, docs.diniscruz.ai, files.diniscruz.ai, Issues-FS__*) was grep-mined for every seed term the founder listed plus every external name the mining surfaced. Counts below are from those runs; the site must regenerate them. Tier definitions: TRACED = corpus evidence exists today; STATED = on the founder's list but thin/absent in the corpus (awaiting his briefing document); DISCOVERED = in the corpus but not on his list (published as a falsifiable claim until he confirms).
TRACED — twelve entries with corpus evidence
T1 · Bret Victor — Inventing on Principle (2012)
The model entry — the register exists (sources/, and the founder holds the full text). Corpus evidence beyond the register: the Joy-of-Programming white paper (docs.diniscruz.ai/docs/2025/07/04/the-joy-of-programming-in-the-age-of-ai-assisted-development.md) builds its central argument on Victor — "Bret Victor, in his influential talk 'Inventing on Principle,' argued that one key to unlocking creative flow is immediate feedback" — and quotes the talk's core line about creators needing an immediate connection to what they create. And the education-gaps article (team/humans/dinis_cruz/briefs/03/28/v0.19.7__article__education-gaps-git-opensource.md) has a section titled "The Brett Victor Problem", applying Victor's point about dogma to education: "the problem with dogma is not that it exists, but that you stop asking the question." One influence, applied in two unrelated domains (developer tooling and education policy) — that breadth is itself trace evidence.
Principle: immediate connection between creator and creation.
Trace: the register's own table (viewer features as unknowing implementations of the talk's demos). Gaps as specs: view time travel; relayout ghosts.
Wider library (the founder asked for other Victor presentations): The Future of Programming (1973 costume talk), Media for Thinking the Unthinkable, Up and Down the Ladder of Abstraction, Stop Drawing Dead Fish, Drawing Dynamic Visualizations, The Humane Representation of Thought, Dynamicland. Each gets one line in Block 7, linked to worrydream.com — never rehosted.
T2 · Simon Wardley & Wardley Maps
Corpus: ~210 files; an entire sibling site (wardley-maps.sgit.ai) whose pack documents the founder's own published Wardley materials — videos, infographics, the maps-as-code work.
Principle: situational awareness before strategy — the map is a falsifiable claim about position and movement.
Format: link-out entry (blocks 1–3 + pointer). The influence page owns the resonance — why a security person reorganised his thinking around evolution axes; the sibling owns the material.
T3 · Tim Berners-Lee & the Semantic Web
The best full-format second entry, because it is an influence argued with. Corpus: ~35 files. Two star exhibits: the Solid-integration brief (team/humans/dinis_cruz/briefs/02/24/v0.6.17__architecture__solid-protocol-integration-complementary-architectures.md — TBL's Solid pods vs sgit vaults as complementary architectures, with Schneier's involvement at Inrupt noted), and the "Semantic Web's Insight (and Mistake)" section in library/concepts/v0_4_0__thinking-in-graphs.md: "The Semantic Web community identified the right problem… But the community made a subtle mistake in practice. They ended up attaching meaning to nodes rather than deriving meaning from edges."
Why this is the format at its strongest: the entry can show resonance (the dream of machine-readable meaning shaped G³, MGraph-DB, the ontology work), disagreement (node-first vs edge-first), and a live architectural conversation (vaults vs pods). Influence is not agreement; it is engagement.
T4 · Graphs
The founding obsession. Corpus: everywhere; its own sibling site. The entry is a link-out with one addition the sibling does not carry: the personal history — where graphs entered the founder's thinking (O2 Platform's code-flow graphs, a research pointer for his briefing doc).
T5 · OWASP & the security community
Corpus: ~271 files, including the Summits history. Link-out to the open-source pack's OWASP material for governance/monetisation (deconfliction), but this entry owns the community-as-influence claim: two decades of participation, the Summit model, and the era itself ("cyber security community" is a kind: era/community entry, the seed list's own phrasing). David Rice's keynote (S5 below) nests under this influence's wider library.
T6 · Flow, and coding in the zone
Three sources converging on one methodology — the site's best demonstration that influences compose. Corpus: ~43 files. Csikszentmihalyi is named and his flow criteria applied in the Joy-of-Programming paper ("In his seminal work, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi identified programming as one of many activities… that can induce flow"); Victor supplies the mechanism (immediate feedback keeps you in it); and IFD is the methodology built from both — library/guides/development/ifd/v1.2.1__ifd__intro-and-how-to-use.md opens: "It centers on preserving developer flow state while leveraging LLMs for code generation" and closes "IFD is about maintaining flow state."
Trace: the entire IFD guide is the trace table. The entry's diagram: Csikszentmihalyi (the state) × Victor (the mechanism) × the founder's practice (the methodology).
T7 · Open source & its licences
Corpus: its own sibling site with the full history pack (11,619-word corpus + 17,909-word history on file). Link-out entry. This entry owns one thing the sibling does not foreground: open source as personal formation — what two decades of releasing tools (O2 Platform onward) taught the founder about licences as social contracts. The Cathedral and the Bazaar (S4) nests here.
T8 · Niklas Luhmann & the Zettelkasten — discovered, now traced
Not on the seed list; the corpus surfaced a dedicated published article: docs.diniscruz.ai/docs/2025/06/18/bridging-niklas-luhmanns-ideas-with-semantic-knowledge-graphs-and-g3.md — a full mapping of the slip-box to G³ ("Luhmann's Zettelkasten was a self-organizing knowledge graph on paper… atomic, uniquely identified, densely linked, emergent in structure, scalable and lifelong"). The article is nearly the influence page already; it needs only the register's trace-table discipline (which G³/MGraph-DB features implement which Zettelkasten property, with versions).
Bonus: the article reaches back to Vannevar Bush's memex — the D5 entry enters through this one.
T9 · Anders Ericsson & deliberate practice
Corpus: ~11 files on the 10,000-hours / deliberate-practice research (properly attributed to Ericsson, not the popularisation). Resonates with the founder's position on skill formation in the AI era. Full entry, medium depth.
T10 · Karl Popper & falsifiability
Corpus: ~7 files. The deepest-running discovered thread: "a map is a claim" (wardley pack), the risks register's falsifiable-statements discipline, this very site's trace-table rule. Popper may be the influence that explains the shape of all the others' entries. Short entry, high leverage.
T11 · Linus Torvalds
Corpus: ~5 files (Git's history, the education-gaps article's Git argument, kernel governance in the open-source history). Nested under T7's wider library or a short standalone — builder of two of the tools the estate stands on (Linux, Git).
T12 · Bruce Schneier
Corpus: ~4 files (the LLM-failure-modes argument; Solid/Inrupt in the TBL brief). Short entry; security-economics thinking as influence on the founder's threat-modelling style.
STATED — the founder's seven, awaiting his briefing documents
Zero or near-zero grep hits today. Published as stubs with status: awaiting-briefing and a research plan each. They are the roadmap, not the debt.
S1 · Neil Peart & Rush. kind: person/music. Research plan: the founder's talks/bios for drumming references; Peart as the craftsman-lyricist archetype — technical mastery plus meaning — an obvious resonance hypothesis to test against the briefing, not assert. S2 · Kevin Kelly's books. kind: books. Candidate anchors to confirm: What Technology Wants, The Inevitable, 1,000 True Fans (essay). The technium's evolutionary framing plausibly connects to Wardley evolution — flag as hypothesis. S3 · Simon Sinek — the golden circle. kind: framework. Why→How→What. Research plan: check his conference talks for golden-circle framing; the sgit.ai site network itself is organised why-first. S4 · The Cathedral and the Bazaar (Eric S. Raymond). kind: work. Nests under T7. The open-source history pack already covers the essay's factual history — this entry owns only what it did to the founder. S5 · David Rice — "Upon the Threshold of Opportunity" (OWASP keynote). kind: presentation. Nests under T5. Research plan: locate the recording (OWASP AppSec archives), and the founder's contemporaneous blog reactions. Rice's Geekonomics is the wider-library item. S6 · Music, and playing in a band. kind: practice/era. The most personal entry; entirely awaiting the briefing. Hypothesis to test: band-playing as the original experience of real-time collaborative flow — the thing IFD tries to recreate in software. S7 · Diverse and distributed teams. kind: practice. Research plan: the founder's management writing, the team-roles system in the corpus, OWASP's global-chapter model as the formative experience.
DISCOVERED — five the corpus surfaced beyond Luhmann
D1 · Christopher Alexander. team/roles/designer/ROLE.md: "Christopher Alexander's pattern language is the direct ancestor of software design patterns. The Designer should think of code as a space that developers inhabit: is it navigable? Is it comfortable?" A load-bearing citation in a live role definition — strong trace.
D2 · Design (capital D) & Steve Jobs — discovered, founder-confirmed 2026-08-25. The founder confirmed this the day the pack shipped: "Design and Steve Jobs approach to Design (with capital D)." The trace was already deep. The Designer ROLE.md is built on Jobs's formulation — "Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works" — and extends it: "Design is the coherence between the internal structure and the external experience." The NotebookLM case-study brief (v0.7.4__brief__advocate-designer-in-the-loop-notebooklm-case-study.md) has a section titled "The Jonathan Ive Principle: Good Design Starts with the User", retells the Jobs MP3-to-CD whiteboard story, and lands the principle: "Good design is invisible… the only way to notice it is to go back to the previous version and think: 'This is way worse.'" And the strongest kind of trace this site recognises — influence turned into process: the "Jonathan Ive test" (is it simpler? would reverting feel worse?) is a mandatory validator for every UI change in the explorer-response brief. Not a quote on a wall; a gate in the pipeline. The wider canon — Rams ("less, but better" as a working API principle), Vignelli, Norman, Eames, Muller-Brockmann, Tschichold, Aalto, Cooper, Krug, Japanese design philosophy — nests under this entry.
D3 · Team Topologies & Cynefin. Listed beside Wardley in the 2019 hiring post. Short entry pending founder confirmation of depth.
D4 · Vannevar Bush & the memex. Enters via the Luhmann article; As We May Think (1945) as the ancestor of the whole external-memory thread — which is also this site network's own thesis. A satisfying loop: the memory network's provenance site tracing the idea of memory networks.
D5 · Mihály Csíkszentmihályi. Named in T6 but deserves his own row in the seed data: Flow (1990) as anchor; the founder's flow entries cite him directly.
The composition view
The entries are not independent — the site's eventual /map/ page (build-order step 7) draws the graph: Bush → Luhmann → graphs → Semantic Web → G³; Victor → flow ← Csikszentmihalyi, both → IFD; Wardley → Popper (maps as claims) → the register format itself; Raymond → open source ← Torvalds; Rice → OWASP. The influence map is itself a G³ instance — the site becomes a demonstration of the thing the influences taught.
This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
source: /briefs/03__site-architecture.md