Why one site per provider rather than one page each
A page per provider on one site drifts into a feature grid: the same six headings, filled in with whatever the vendor's marketing says, and no room for the part that matters. A site per provider has room for the part that matters — the labs, the examples, the failures, the cost table, the ledger — and it forces the shared material out into a hub, which is this.
The split is:
| Lives here | Lives on the provider site |
|---|---|
| The four credential patterns, and the tier axis | Which of them this provider supports, per product |
| The claim-state model, and the family roll-up | That site's own ledger, every claim with its date |
| The comparison across providers | The cost table, the failures, the workloads |
| Disclosures, estate-wide | The disclosure line for that provider, at the top of every page |
| The page contract every site obeys | Everything the contract asks for |