From riskmandate.ai, the page as fetched on 2026-09-24 · open the live page ↗Everything on this sheet is the source site's own text; the newsroom's chrome is outside it.
llms.txt catches up with the insurability pitch · voice feedback interview prompt
- The machine-readable surface was a release behind.
llms.txt,llms-full.txtand.well-known/agent-content.jsonstill carried "Agents act. You own the risk" with zero mentions of insurability, carriers or the Index — so every agent reading us got the superseded pitch while the site itself led on insurability. Fixed at source insrc/data/site-content.json, which generates all three. - The concept set is rewritten and grown from six to eight: the insurability layer, the Insurability Index (five weighted dimensions, six levels), grant-is-not-mandate, no-deny, never-in-the-request- path, accepted-is-not-acceptable, the SG/Vault foundation, and positioning. The honest caveats travel with them — weights are underwriting judgement rather than actuarial fact; we define the mandate and map the gap but do not enforce it; the EU AI Act point is factual, not legal advice.
- A smoke group now guards it, so the machine surface cannot silently drift from the live positioning again.
- Build ordering fixed. The llm artifacts were written after the smoke suite ran, so a failing smoke left them stale — and the next run then validated yesterday's file. They are generated outputs that the smoke inspects, so they are now written first. This was a genuine chicken-and-egg: the brand assertion kept failing against a file the failure itself prevented from regenerating.
- Three stale two-word brand strings fixed in
assets/library/library.json. - New:
team/prompts/voice-feedback-interview.md— a prompt for ChatGPT to run a voice-mode feedback interview with people who have seen a RiskMandate presentation, and produce a debrief. It reads the site first, treats the homepage as authoritative, keeps turns short for voice, leads the debrief with objections rather than praise, asks consent to quote explicitly, and instructs the interviewer that most capability is proposed rather than shipped.