sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · sgit.ai

On this page

Reading room / sgit.ai · raw text · live ↗

From sgit.ai, the page as fetched on 2026-09-25 · open the live page ↗Everything on this sheet is the source site's own text; the newsroom's chrome is outside it.

Brief for Claude Code, sgit.ai design improvements

From: Dinis Cruz To: a Claude Code session working on this vault Date: 2026-08-11 · site v0.1.3 Status: open, standing brief

Context

You are inside the vault that is the sgit.ai website. This is a vault app: 13 generated HTML pages, decrypted and rendered in the browser, deployed by sgit push. The current design (light theme, system fonts, teal accent, dark terminal blocks) is a functional first pass written by an agent without visual rendering. It is honest and consistent, but it has never been through a design iteration with eyes on it.

Your task: propose and implement design improvements, keeping the site's voice (precise, honest, no hype) and its engineering constraints intact.

What to improve (in rough priority order)

  1. Visual identity. The site currently has no logotype, no distinctive graphic element beyond the server-sees diagram. Explore: a simple wordmark for sgit.ai, a favicon-style mark (inline SVG only), and a consistent iconography for the feature/use-case cards (small inline SVGs, not emoji, emoji render inconsistently).
  2. Hero. The landing hero is plain text. Consider a restrained visual, e.g. an inline-SVG motif of the encrypt-then-push flow, or subtle background texture, without pushing the terminal demo below the fold on a laptop.
  3. Typography rhythm. Check the serif/sans pairing, heading scale, and vertical rhythm across landing vs docs pages. All fonts must remain system-stack (no external fonts, the sandbox blocks external hosts, and we ship nothing we don't control).
  4. The server-sees diagram. It's the signature visual of the whole project. Make it memorable: consider drawing it as one inline SVG (padlock, arrow, ciphertext) rather than two HTML lists, while keeping it accessible (real text, not paths).
  5. Mobile pass. The nav wraps on small screens; the terminal tabs and Rosetta-stone table need a real phone-width check. Test at 360px.
  6. Accessibility. Verify contrast ratios on the light palette (especially --dim text and the terminal caption), focus states on tabs/buttons, and heading order.
  7. Micro-interactions. The reveal-on-scroll and tab switches are minimal. Small touches welcome; nothing that requires a framework or breaks without JS.
  8. Optional: dark-mode support via prefers-color-scheme, keeping the light theme as default. Only if it can be done cleanly in the token layer of assets/site.css.

Hard constraints (do not break these)

Workflow

  1. sgit clone <vault-key> (or sgit pull if already cloned).
  2. Make changes in the generator + assets; run the build; run validation.
  3. If an sg-playwright service is available, screenshot the live pages and iterate on what you see; otherwise state clearly what you could not visually verify.
  4. sgit commit -m "site v0.1.n: <what changed>" and sgit push.
  5. Leave a short debrief note in admin/ describing what you changed and why.

Deliverable

A pushed release (version bumped, versions page updated) plus your debrief note. Propose before you sweep: if you want to change the site's structure (new pages, removed sections) rather than its design, write the proposal into admin/ first and stop for human review.