title: Booking a person description: "Two of the four tiers are a booking rather than a download: a person reviewing your situation, and an assessment by a team. What a booking commits, what it does not, and why a signature is a separate thing you cannot buy yet." lead: "Tier 3↗ and tier 4↗ are bookings. What is bought is a person's time, and in tier 4's case a team's. That changes what the page can promise, so this one says what a booking commits us to, what it does not, and the one thing it is often mistaken for." order: 6 toc: true

Only one of the four is a booking

Three of the four levels need nobody to be scheduled. The downloaded pack, the working vault and the corrected vault are produced without a conversation: you pick, you pay, and the work happens. Only the £1,500 level↗ is a booking, because it is the one whose cost is somebody's time.

That line — between a thing agents do and a thing a person sits down for — is the line between the third level and the fourth, and it is the only reason the price moves as far as it does. {{claim:abp-correction-by-a-person}}

What the two sessions are

Half an hour to interview your team, and half an hour to deliver. The first finds out what is actually running — which agents, on what accounts, with which credentials, and what anybody believes they are for. The second walks through what came back.

Between them, the work. The mandate is built from the interview rather than from a form, the delta is recomputed against it, and a security professional reviews and signs off what is delivered. {{claim:abp-sessions-by-a-person}}

Two sessions is what is sold. More is a separate conversation, and saying so before you buy is cheaper than discovering it afterwards.

What a booking does not buy

A signed opinion as a formal instrument. A security professional reviewing and signing off the work is not the company issuing a signed opinion, and the wording for that still does not exist. The two are kept apart on every page here, because they are one word away from each other and a buyer could reasonably assume the first is the second. {{claim:opinion-wording-absent}}

Not a compliance assessment, and not a mark of conformity. Neither word describes this and neither appears on anything that comes out of it. The family of words around conformity marking is avoided outright: it raises the standard of care beyond ordinary negligence and buys a buyer nothing.

A named individual's professional responsibility. The company issues every opinion, with an express non-assumption of personal responsibility on its face. And the person who sells is not the person who signs — which is why no individual is named on this page, on the checkout, or beside a price anywhere on this site.

What comes out of a booking

Triage, not raw findings. Every finding that reaches you has been reproduced, not reviewed. Recall-optimised agents run at 0.388 precision — about three findings in five are wrong — and passing that list on unfiltered would be selling somebody their own homework. {{claim:precision-0388}}

Marked outputs. Anything model generated says so on its face, not only in a footer. {{claim:transparency-article}}

A record, never a verdict. Where the work names a third party — a vendor, a platform, a standards body, a competitor — what is written down is facts, dates and sources, with no evaluative adjective attached to anybody's name.

How to book

Buy the level, and the sessions are scheduled after. Your order↗ takes you to the payment provider; the conversation follows the purchase rather than gating it, which is the opposite of how consulting is usually sold and is the reason it can be bought from a card at all.

At the event: the code on the card, which redirects to the delivery page for that level and says what it covers before you commit.

There is no form on this site — it does not collect anything, from anybody, ever.

This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).