sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · abp.sgit.ai

On this page

Reading room / abp.sgit.ai · raw text · live ↗

From abp.sgit.ai, the page as fetched on 2026-09-24 · open the live page ↗Everything on this sheet is the source site's own text; the newsroom's chrome is outside it.

The model

The four objects an ABP is made of, the grammar they are written in, the barrier that decides whether anything is in the way, and the graph rules that govern all of it.

Source: https://abp.sgit.ai/model/index.html↗ · site v0.11.0 · this file is generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift. Every page on this site has a .md twin; internal links below point at them.


Home↗ / The model

The model

An ABP is not a document. It is four objects, of which the document is a rendering. The order they are produced in is the order this page teaches them, because a grant without a mandate beside it is an inventory and nobody acts on an inventory.

The four objects

ObjectWhat it isHow it is obtained
The mandateWhat the agent is authorised and expected to doElicited. In minutes, because the deployer already knows it
The grantEverything the agent can doMeasured. From the deployment shape: the product, where it runs, with what account, with what credentials
The deltaThe difference. Excess where it can and you did not ask; shortfall where you asked and it cannotDerived. Recomputed whenever the grant or the mandate changes, stored with the versions of both, and never edited by hand
The barrierWhat stands between the agent and each capabilityRecorded, per capability, from one of four kinds

Three hundred and forty things is a shrug. Three hundred and forty things and you authorised twelve is a finding. The mandate is the edge that gives the grant a shape, and it has to be captured even though it is already known.

Why the delta is derived and never authored

Nobody writes a delta. It is only ever the output of a computation over the grant and the mandate, and it is stored along with the versions of both inputs and the time it was computed. That is what makes it checkable rather than stale. What follows from that↗, including why this site said the opposite this morning.

The pieces

The capability grammar↗: verb.object.reach. 23 primitives, each with the undo class of its effect. Promoted from the published map. Nothing renamed.

The barrier↗: Four kinds, and only the fourth bounds anything. The enforcer test, published as a glyph before it was named as a rule.

The undo class↗: Three classes, and the ordering on every rendering this site produces. A property of the action. Not a severity.

The lexicon↗: Every word the grammar is spelled with, as a node with its own address: ten verbs, nine object classes, five reach classes, nine families. read.file.project is three nodes, not a string.

The delta↗: Derived and never authored. Stored with its inputs pinned, recomputed when either moves, and never edited by hand. Corrected on 11 September, in the open.

The graph↗: Five rules that govern the model rather than the styling. Rule five is the acceptance test and it is cheap to apply.

The universes↗: One capability row walked through nine worlds, from the source bytes to a licence condition, each with its own owner and ontology. An ABP is a junction object. This is Fractal Semantic Graphs applied to it.

The schema↗: What is in the published files, and what a consumer has to state. A consumer pins a version.

The five examples↗: Five ABPs, derived from the data rather than authored. Each states which rows were measured and which derived.

What is deliberately not modelled

Quantity. The primitives carry reach and not rate. send.endpoint.world is the same primitive for one request and a million. The temporal operators of a policy language, count-within and sum-within, are the shape of the fix and they are not here yet.

Interaction between agents. Two agents each within mandate can compose into something neither was authorised to do. There is no primitive for it and this is the only sentence about it on the site.

Consequence. Deliberately, and it is the rule above every other rule on this site. No assets, no consequences, no score. That is not modesty: no assets does not mean no consequence, it means no consequence to you. An agent with send.endpoint.world and execute.process.host in an empty environment can still reach third parties.

Provenance. 21 of 99 capability rows from the published map were measured, meaning seen directly on the thing itself. The other 78 were derived from what the deployment architecturally is, or from the vendor's published documentation. Those rows trace to the published capability map↗, retrieved 2026-09-11T13:00:37Z, content hash sha256:d6d4ba40f1fb1f93f66. The source bytes↗. A further 42 rows across 8 shapes were contributed by riskmandate.ai, 16 of them at the contributor's measured tier and 26 read from vendor documentation on a date; this site did not observe any of them and keeps the tier as stated. Retrieved 2026-09-20T17:23:43Z, content hash sha256:cb76bf9147de9ec2e38. The contributed bytes↗.


Site index for agents↗ · HTML version↗