sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · newsroom.sgit.ai · llms-full

On this page

Reading room / newsroom.sgit.ai / llms-full.txt · section 3 of 20

newsroom.sgit.ai — The Future of News

News is failing not because there is too little information but because there is no walkable chain from a claim to its evidence, no way for a correction to reach what it disproved, and no way to pay the person who did the original work. A story is a graph that accumulates evidence, perspectives and confidence; every article is a projection of it. Sell the graph, not the paragraph.

Source: https://newsroom.sgit.ai/index.html↗ · site v0.3.13 · markdown twin of the front page.


What is broken today

Most articles do not provide evidence, they provide a link. The link is never followed, and it could go to a site that no longer exists.

The 10,000-hours case. A 1993 study of violin students found the top group had practised an average of ~10,000 hours by age 20 — roughly half the group had not reached it. Popularised in 2008 as a threshold. The original researcher spent his career correcting it. None of it ever attached to the claim. The full story → ↗

The turn

In a document, a correction is a new document. Nothing that cited the original knows. In a graph, a correction is an edge. This is the inverse of how misinformation works today: a false claim propagates virally and the correction barely travels. In this model, the correction propagates with the same force as the original claim.

Numbers this argument stands on

242 papersciting one biomedical belief, tracing back to nothing
>220,000supporting citation paths behind that same belief
£8.40fully-itemised production cost of one worked story, 6h 23m
~200mssettlement time on the x402 payment rail, zero protocol fees
10 articles68,846 words, publicly dated since February 2025
59pusable credit from a £1 card top-up — the wall micropayments removes

What runs on this site

Everything above is an argument. These are running instances of it, each a site inside the site, built by agents and reviewed before publication:

This does not launch as a manifesto

Ten core articles — 68,846 words — were published on docs.diniscruz.ai ↗ between February and October 2025, a year before the design material behind the rest of this site was written. The full chronology → ↗

The honest sentence: Most of this site is an argument, not a product. Three things run — /portugal/, /databases/ and /governance/ — and each says its own limits on its face; only the first has a human editor of record, and none has had legal review. The articles in the library are real and dated. The newsroom — the roles, the provenance pages, the payment rails, Trust-as-a-Service — is a design. The line between them → ↗

For an agent

This site argues that a story is a graph and an article is one projection of it. Nothing here runs today — read /shipped/ ↗ before citing anything as a live capability. Published by the sgit project, which is building the stack it argues for: read the participant disclosure ↗ before treating any page here as neutral. llms.txt↗ is the whole agent surface.


== briefs/00__BRIEF.md