newsroom.sgit.ai — Brief Pack
Pack version: v1.0 · 21 August 2026
Target site: newsroom.sgit.ai — The Future of News
Sources: the-cyber-boardroom/SGraph-AI__App__Send @ v0.33.62 (read-only) · DinisCruz/docs.diniscruz.ai @ v0.3.123 · DinisCruz/files.diniscruz.ai
Siblings: sgit.ai · nhi.sgit.ai (v0.1.19) · pki.sgit.ai (v0.1.4) · graphs.sgit.ai (in build) · sg-sentinel.sgit.ai (v0.1.1)
0. Why newsroom and not news
The corpus names this domain to itself as "the future-of-news stack" — 21 occurrences across 13 files, always hyphenated, coined in the 5 July evidence-economy brief and propagated into the reality tree. Unhyphenated "future of news" returns zero.
But the material is overwhelmingly about how news gets made, proven and paid for, not about news itself: newsroom appears 173 times across 42 files. newsroom.sgit.ai also sidesteps the convention that a news. subdomain means company announcements — a slot sgit.ai/updates/ already fills.
And, as the brief for this pack put it, it holds for future directions as we start to execute some of these ideas. A site called news is a research site. A site called newsroom can become a running newsroom without a rename.
Site title: The Future of News. Domain terse, title carrying the thesis — the same split as pki.sgit.ai ("Public Key Infrastructure for Agents").
1. The one-paragraph thesis
News is failing not because there is too little information but because there is no walkable chain from a claim to its evidence, no way for a correction to reach what it disproved, and no way to pay the person who did the original work. Each of those is a graph problem. A story is not an article — it is a graph that accumulates evidence, perspectives, entities and confidence, of which every article, infographic, translation and per-sector briefing is a projection. Make the editorial process public, make the citation chain typed and signed, and the two things that follow are that corrections propagate and facts become billable upstream. That is the future-of-news stack: sell the graph, not the paragraph.
2. What exists — three corpora, ~110,000 words
| Source | Material | State |
|---|---|---|
__Send repo | ~35,000 words of core news material across 18 Tier-A documents, plus trust/rights/monetisation infrastructure | Unpublished. Almost all CC BY 4.0 |
docs.diniscruz.ai | 68,846 words across 10 core published articles, Feb 2025 – Oct 2025 | Already public. Full metadata captured — see §4 |
| External CBR repo | ~15,000 words, three documents that look like the origin of the thread | Not retrieved. See gap N1 |
The docs.diniscruz.ai material predates the __Send material by roughly a year and is in the founder's public voice. It is the site's prior art and must be linked, not silently absorbed — see 02__source-provenance-and-attribution.md, which is the load-bearing file in this pack.
3. The eight themes
Full treatment with sources in 01__thesis-and-themes.md.
- The story is a graph; the article is a projection. (Very developed.) One story node → seven audience projections. "Sell the graph, not the paragraph."
- Provenance is the product; the editorial process is public. (Very developed.) 15 newsroom departments each with a public page; a per-story provenance page with a real cost breakdown. "A newsroom that shows its work earns trust that a black-box newsroom cannot."
- Corrections must propagate; staleness is first-class. (The most distinctive argument in the corpus.) "In a document, a correction is a new document. Nothing that cited the original knows."
- The economics: pay the fact creator, not the last-mile publisher. (Argued, mechanism open.) A worked 60/25/10/5% upstream split from Feb 2026.
- Trust as a purchasable product. (Commercially developed, operationally thin.) The fact-certifier as a distinct, payable, warranted role. Named Trust-as-a-Service (43 occurrences).
- Content rights and the legal stick. (One strong doc, untouched since Feb.) CC-Signed licence variants — break the signature chain, break the licence.
- Agentic newsroom operations: more humans, not fewer. (Developed, unbuilt.) Explicitly "not an effort to replace journalists with agents. The opposite."
- Meaning, concepts and multilingual publishing. (Newest, actively moving.) The author is the oracle; "disagreement is the product."
4. The four numbers that carry the site
Real, sourced, and unusually good for a public argument. Full set in 01__thesis-and-themes.md §4.
- The 10,000-hours case — 1993 Berlin violin study; the figure was an average, not a threshold, and roughly half the top group had not reached it. The researcher spent his career correcting it. None of it ever attached to the claim.
- The citation network — one biomedical belief supported by 242 papers, 675 citations, >220,000 supporting citation paths, tracing back to nothing. Three named distortion mechanisms: citation bias, amplification, invention.
- A worked per-story provenance page — "EU AI Act Implementation in Portugal", 12 May 2026: £8.40 production cost, 6h 23m, broken down research £3.20 / reporting £2.80 / fact-checking £0.90 / translation £1.10 / graphics £0.40. 12 sources, 2 expert validations, 3 reader contributions.
- The payment rail is now real — x402 at the Linux Foundation since April 2026, ~200ms settlement, ~169m transactions in year one, zero protocol fees; GA in CloudFront/WAF June 2026; Cloudflare Monetization Gateway announced 1 July 2026. And the wall it removes: a £1 card top-up returns 59p of usable credit.
5. Build order
| Step | Section | Why here | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | / + /thesis/ — the walkable chain | The one argument everything else serves | ✍️ fresh, from quotes in 01 |
| 2 | /corrections/ — why corrections must propagate | The most distinctive argument, and the 10,000-hours story carries it with no technical background needed | ✅ near-as-is |
| 3 | /provenance/ — the editorial process as publication | "Provenance is the product." Ships with the worked £8.40 page | ✅ near-as-is |
| 4 | /library/ — the 10 published articles, with full source metadata | Do this early. It is the site's evidence that this is a two-year thread, not a launch | ✅ data ready in sources__docs-diniscruz-ai.json |
| 5 | /economics/ — paying the fact creator | Where the argument becomes a business | ✅ near-as-is |
| 6 | /newsroom/ — operations, 11 agent roles, the daily clock | The "future directions" half of the name | ✏️ de-scope from Portugal specifics |
| 7 | /rights/ — CC-Signed and the legal stick | Untouched since Feb; strong and unusual | ✅ |
| 8 | /shipped/ — what runs vs what is argued | Non-negotiable. See §6 | ✍️ fresh |
| 9 | /network/ — boundaries against the four siblings | Prevents the duplication mapped in 06 | ✏️ |
| 10 | /infographics/ | Inherits the graphs-pack pipeline work | ✏️ |
6. The honesty constraint
Per team/roles/librarian/reality/, the entire evidence-economy cluster is marked "PROPOSED — does not exist yet" (P-428/429/430, P-817/818/819). Nothing in the newsroom stack ships.
What does exist and can be pointed at: the vault substrate (articles-as-vaults, mini-site deployment, vault CI) — which belongs to sgit.ai and should be cited, not re-explained; MyFeeds as a live personalised-news pipeline, which cannot be published in detail; and the ten published articles, which are real and dated.
The honest sentence: "Nothing on this site is running yet. The articles are real and dated; the newsroom is a design. Here is the line between them."
⚠️ One safety-specific caution. library/docs/_to_process/secure-send-strategic-opportunities.md §16.3 describes a SecureDrop-style source-protection vertical — no IP logging, Tor, anonymous upload, auto-delete. Publishing that as a claim before it exists would put a real source at risk. Publish it as a design, explicitly labelled, or not at all.
7. What is in this pack
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
00__BRIEF.md | This document |
01__thesis-and-themes.md | Eight themes, 32 sourced quotes, the numbers |
02__source-provenance-and-attribution.md | The provenance contract — how every republished page keeps its link to the original |
03__corpus-index__send-repo.md | The __Send documents, tiered, with paths |
04__prior-art__docs-diniscruz-ai.md | The 10 published articles with verified URLs, dates, authors, PDFs, LinkedIn posts |
05__site-architecture.md | Page-by-page IA with sources |
06__boundaries-and-house-style.md | Sibling boundaries, redaction watch-list, conventions |
07__gaps-and-open-questions.md | What must be written fresh; what must be retrieved |
08__source-manifest.csv | Machine-readable, both corpora, with provenance columns |
sources__docs-diniscruz-ai.json | Machine-readable provenance record — 13 articles |
Every __Send path was verified at v0.33.62. Every docs.diniscruz.ai URL was resolved live.
This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
== briefs/01__thesis-and-themes.md