sgit newsroom v0.1.29 · snapshot 2026-09-24

Reading room · abp.sgit.ai

On this page

Reading room / abp.sgit.ai · raw text · live ↗

From abp.sgit.ai, the page as fetched on 2026-09-24 · open the live page ↗Everything on this sheet is the source site's own text; the newsroom's chrome is outside it.

write.file.project

Change the project it is working on. Reach project, undo with-effort. Which published deployment shapes have it, at what barrier, and what the starting mandates say.

Source: https://abp.sgit.ai/model/capabilities/write.file.project/index.html↗ · site v0.11.0 · this file is generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift. Every page on this site has a .md twin; internal links below point at them.


Home↗ / The model↗ / The capabilities↗ / write.file.project

write.file.project

Change the project it is working on. Its effect is with-effort: undone at a cost.

What this id is made of

This is not a string. It is write↗.file↗.project↗, three nodes joined by three edges, and each of them has an address, a page and a JSON file. Follow any of them and you get the query for that word rather than a definition of it.

NodeEdgeReads as
write↗has_verbthis capability has the verb write
file↗acts_onthis capability acts on file
project↗reachesthis capability reaches project
filesystem↗in_familythis capability is in the filesystem family
with-effort↗has_undo_classthis capability has the undo class with-effort

The gloss above is a convenience, not the definition. A node carries no inherent meaning: what write.file.project is emerges from the edges traceable from it. The strongest case is project↗, where the deployment shapes that use it do not agree about what it means, and the page keeps the disagreement rather than averaging it.

In 6 of 17 published shapes

Deployment shapeBarrier thereKnown byWhose materialNote
●Claude Code on the web (a remote session container)none (not a control)observednot statedthe attached working tree is writable
●Claude Code (the CLI, on your own machine)none (not a control)derivednot stated
●Claude Code (the CLI, on your own machine)none (not a control)derivednot stated
●Claude Desktop (a desktop app with local tools)none (not a control)derivednot stated
●Actions runner (a hosted CI job)none (not a control)observednot statedthe checked-out tree at this ref is writable by the job
●A self-hosted n8n instance, reached with an owner-scoped API key (contributed by riskmandate.ai)none (not a control)measuredorganisationfull create-change-delete confirmed: created, deactivated and deleted one real test workflow in the session. The write-up records the API key as "the technical gate - broad, but a real gate, not a prose rule"; in this vocabulary a key that permits a thing is the grant, not a barrier, so the row stands at none.
BarrierWhat stands in the wayIs it a control
●nonenothing in the wayno
◉expectationa rule in prose, enforced by nobodyno
◐settinga switch the agent's own account can flipno
○boundaryenforced above the grant, out of the agent's reachyes

What the starting mandates say about it

The mandate saysWhich mandates
authorisedA coding assistant on my machine, A coding assistant in a container on the web, The desktop app, with local tools switched on, A CI job on a hosted runner, A sandbox: build and run one AI-agent workflow
refusednone
unstatedChat, with connectors switched on, Chat in the browser, nothing connected, A browser extension I installed, A scheduled job under a service account, A reader on my mailbox, Find things in the inbox, draft replies, never send, A reader on my drive, Search our tenant, read-only, Find and read my files, An assistant over my Workspace, reading, What the agent inferred it was authorised to do, from one session

Unstated is not authorised. A mandate that never mentioned a capability did not authorise it, and the delta on every example page counts it as excess and says which kind it was.

What would move it to the fourth barrier

WhatWhat it costsThe barrier afterwards
a review before mergea reviewer's timesetting

This is a published reduction, not a recommendation. Whether it is worth doing depends on the assets and the consequences, which are not in this document and are not this site's to guess. Since v0.4.3 it is also a node, setting/write.file.project, in the deployment shape universe↗: it narrows this capability and moves it to the barrier named in the third column, which is the path the prohibitions table's last column is a projection of.

The capability grammar↗ · This primitive as JSON↗


Site index for agents↗ · HTML version↗